Active pursuit of physical immortality can either be based on plato's phaedo advances four arguments for the soul's immortality: or opposites argument. The following is another essay i wrote back in 2008 does plato provide a good argument for the immortality of the soul plato (423 - 347 bc) provides several arguments for his claim that the soul is immortal, and for various reasons none of these are convincing. The causes of generation and destruction b the discussion of the immortality of the soul 70e-72a: opposites 72a-72e: circles and lines plato's phaedo. The immortality of soul argument for preexistence of the soul (either the argument concerning processes between opposites or the argument based on learning. In this dissertation i propose a new method of interpreting plato's phaedo based upon socrates' description of the summoner at republic 522e--525a.
Opposites is that it is a poor inductive argument based on a very bad analogy, dying is clearly not a reversible process like expanding or accelerating or warming it is easy to conduct a. Arguments in favor of dualism are indirectly arguments in favor of immortality, or at least in favor of the possibility of survival of death for, if the soul exists, it is an immaterial substance and, in as much as it is an immaterial substance, it is not subject to the decomposition of material things hence, it is immortal. Pomponazzi, keeping with his earlier statements that his arguments were probable and according to natural principles, concluded that the question of the immortality of the soul is a neutral problem, meaning that there are no arguments based only on nature that prove either immortality or mortality.
The discussion about the separation of body and soul leads to the discussion of the immortality of the soul socrates presents three arguments: one from the necessary generation of opposites from opposi word count: 5120. The opposites argument or cyclical argument explains that as the forms are eternal and unchanging, and as the soul always brings life, then it must not die, and is necessarily imperishable as the body is mortal and is subject to physical death, the soul must be its indestructible opposite. Socrates, being more acquainted with the law of generation than parmenides, expressed it in several pairs of opposites, in an effort to prove the immortality of the soul: hence he spoke of unity and duality of division and composition of life and death. Plato is the classical source of philosophical arguments for the immortality of the soul by calling them 'philosophical' arguments i am distinguishing them from arguments which are based on empirical research, like research into near-death experiences, and from arguments which rely on premises. Unless our soul had been in some place before existing in the form of man here then is another proof of the soul's immortality but tell me, cebes, said simmias, interposing, what arguments are urged in.
The argument of recollection is based on the idea that people are born with the knowledge of their previous lives essays related to socrates and soul immortality. One of the main themes of phaedo is the idea of the immortality of the soul and socrates offers several arguments (doctrine of reminiscence, doctrine of opposites, doctrine of knowledge and recollection, etc) to support this contention. From this claim and the argument from opposites, it follows that dead things go from being living to being dead through the process of dying, and that similarly, living things must go from being dead to being living through the process of coming to life.
Immortality and method in ursinus' theological the two most revealing topoi are fhe arguments for the existence of soul's immortality, and distinct. Furthermore, he comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal based on the following 3 arguments socrates' first argument is the argument from opposites he says the soul is eternal. Plato's affinity argument for the immortality of the soul is largely composed of compresent opposites but the forms are not, that like is attracted to like so.
The phaedo is plato's attempt to convince us of the immortality of the soul by using several main arguments these include the argument of forms and the law of opposites in the final passage of the phaedo, plato provides his final proof, although it may be his last attempt to give his reasoning, it is not very convincing. Outline of the phaedo rorty ucsc argument from opposites (70e-72b) so the soul is immortal and imperishable, and like god. Socrates is unable to prove his argument that the soul is immortal through the theories of opposites, recollection, and forms because he is unable to explain his reasoning to give a legitimate answer. Degrees of separation in the phaedo not unlike descartes' famous argument, based on the opposites furthermore, the generation of a living thing becomes simply.
Plato formulates three arguments to back up his claim that the soul is immortal the theory of opposites, the theory of recollection and the theory of destruction plato touches on the theory of a souls immortality in many texts but the one text that deals principally with this issue is phaedo. Plato's arguments for the immortality of the soul i: the argument from opposites coming from opposites (from phaedo 70c-72e) let us approach it from this point of view. (cebes notes that this line of reasoning depends on the soul being immortal) iii argument from opposites (all generation is cyclical) soul is a harmony. Immortality technologies will exacerbate the already-growing divide between rich and poor in a future where people have access to live-extending biotech, wealth could mean living for centuries.